This version (2017/05/27 13:44) is a draft.
Approvals: 0/1

[09:58:41] <purplefox> cescoffier: pmlopes temporalfox morning guys, can you give me 10 mins before we start the meeting?

[09:58:49] <temporalfox> ok

[09:58:54] <pmlopes> sure

[10:00:15] <cescoffier> no problem

[12:31:16] * sendak.freenode.net sets mode: +oo purplefox temporalfox [12:34:41] * sendak.freenode.net sets mode: +oo purplefox temporalfox

[15:32:21] <penthief> Using vertx 3.0.0, vertx.executeBlocking is usually very fast but sometimes it takes a couple of seconds.

[19:05:44] <melvinross> if you send a message over the event bus and it's recieved by a vertical on the same instance, is the transport mechanism the same as if it were received by a different instance on the same machine, or within the networked cluster?

[19:07:27] <BadApe> i am not technically in a place to answer, but from what i understood, the eventbus once clustered, if you publish all listeners would pick up the message

[19:09:05] <melvinross> i'm not asking if they would pick up the message, they do

[19:09:46] <melvinross> i'm asking if you did a publish and some consumers were inside of the same JVM instance, and others where attached over the network or inside of a different JVM instance, if the mechanism to send the message is the same

[19:09:55] <BadApe> so you what to know if it is a network broadcast?

[19:10:18] <BadApe> i assume not until hazelcast has started broadcasting

[19:12:29] <melvinross> rather i want to know if hazelcast is involved at all when it comes to delivering event bus messages to verticles running inside the same JVM instance

[19:12:56] <melvinross> assuming that vertx has been started in clustered mode

[19:13:30] <BadApe> you could double check but looking at your network traffic

[19:13:42] <melvinross> that's a good point

[19:13:44] <BadApe> however as it is something you have to configure and start up, i would suggest not

[19:13:51] <amr> can you use the event bus to send distributed messages?

[19:14:02] <amr> as in, via the network

[19:14:07] <BadApe> what is a distrubted message? .publish?

[19:14:18] <amr> as in, have it arrive on a verticle on another server

[19:14:23] <BadApe> sure once you have hazelcast (ha) working, we said that it will pick it up

[19:14:37] <amr> oh, i didnt know that!

[19:14:40] <BadApe> oh

[19:14:42] <melvinross> ha

[19:14:44] <BadApe> read up :) we just said it

[19:14:53] <amr> oh im bloody blind

[19:14:59] <amr> thanks :)

[19:15:03] <melvinross> it's not a matter of vertx not working

[19:15:10] <BadApe> no problem it is friday, i have beer :)

[19:15:57] <melvinross> i'm trying to get my large well known company to adopt vertx as the platform for a new high profile project

[19:16:11] <amr> thats actually how i came to learn of vertx

[19:16:19] <amr> used internally at a bigcorp

[19:16:51] <BadApe> here is my advice, you aren't going to be able to do that, write something small using it and show others

[19:17:02] <melvinross> oh i already am :-)

[19:17:25] <melvinross> talk is cheap after all

[19:17:57] <melvinross> but phase 1 is still effectively a non-demo discussion

[19:18:34] <melvinross> from an engineering perspective, vertx is clearly the better choice (compared to falcon)

[19:18:58] <BadApe> never heard of it

[19:19:03] <melvinross> but there's a lot of “i want to code in python for the sake of coding in python” to fight

[19:19:15] <BadApe> you work for bose?

[19:19:19] <amr> sounds like jp morgan

[19:19:47] <melvinross> http://falconframework.org/

[19:19:51] <BadApe> i like python, but imho it is for devops work

[19:20:26] <BadApe> not for production platform that have to scale

[19:20:33] <BadApe> yeah i am sure there are some good projects out there

[19:20:58] <BadApe> ok, question, so i want to run my Verticle from eclipse ide so i can debug etc

[19:21:19] <melvinross> are you using maven/grade or not?

[19:21:19] <BadApe> i followed the blog about making a fat jar, but that doesn't really help with my dev process

[19:21:24] <BadApe> maven

[19:21:46] <BadApe> i've not really figured out grade yet, not seen the advantage

[19:22:14] <BadApe> ant → maven, i saw right away, but maven → grade not seen the advantage to learn it yet

[19:23:02] <melvinross> admittedly I actually don't use maven or gradle inside of eclipse and just included the jars since i have vertx installed in my VM

[19:24:46] <melvinross> so you can launch from the command line?

[19:25:01] <melvinross> if so, then it's just setting up a new run config

[20:01:46] <francis_> hello, i've created a verticle, i want to pass in some parameters, when it is deployed i guess i could use new MyVerticle(data)

[20:01:55] <francis_> i have a feeling that isn't the right way

[20:10:09] <melvinross> what makes you think there's something wrong with using a constructor?

[21:15:52] *** ChanServ sets mode: +o purplefox

[21:32:14] <BadApe> i have some code that looks like server.connectHandler(socket → { vertx.deployVerticle(new ClientVerticle(socket)); …

[21:33:29] <BadApe> inside the ClientVerticle there is a socket.handler that tries to deserialise some json, however when there seems to be some extra data being send when a client connects

[22:34:29] <amr> actually thats a good point

[22:41:57] <amr> guess you cant have the constructor when specifying the string of the class instead of an instance

[23:03:53] <amr> oh, pass it in deploymentoptions

[23:03:56] <amr> duh

[23:33:06] <BadApe> can't see how you would pass in a class constructor value using deployment options