Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+[06:22:52] *** ChanServ sets mode: +o temporalfox
+[08:07:43] *** ChanServ sets mode: +o purplefox
+[08:15:05] <jac0> Is is possible to use a regular JDBC connection within a verticle, if only that verticle is writing to the db?
+[08:16:27] <jac0> I'm used to querydsl/jooq along with try-with-resources.
+[09:57:01] *** ChanServ sets mode: +o temporalfox
+[10:18:44] <aesteve> hi everyone :)
+[10:19:45] <aesteve> I just wanted to ask one question since I might have some free time this weekend, pmlopes. Could you tell me if you agree with https://github.com/aesteve/vertx-sse
+[10:20:03] <aesteve> or if you think it's an over-complicated API (especially wrapping the HttpServerResponse)
+[10:24:36] <amr> aesteve: did you find many good quality examples of vertx set ups,
+[10:26:12] <aesteve> what do you mean by setups ? re. the examples . Here you have the whole list https://github.com/vert-x/vertx-examples
+[10:26:50] <aesteve> and here's another one : https://github.com/aesteve/vertx-feeds
+[10:28:55] <amr> I found the examples in the first repo a bit simple, would be interested in seeing some examples with many verticles, or examples of scaling
+[10:29:08] <amr> thanks for the last one, will take a look:)
+[10:30:57] <aesteve> this is kinda hard to write such examples
+[10:31:36] <aesteve> like scaling really depends on your application, sometimes you'll need 4 instances of a webserver because you think it's the bottleneck of your application, sometimes you'll scale differently
+[10:32:30] <amr> true
+[10:32:45] <amr> your vertx-feeds looks good though
+[10:32:51] <amr> very helpful, thanks :)
+[10:33:14] <aesteve> for instance in the vertx-feeds example, if I had to scale, I'd keep one instance for the worker verticles (obviously), one instance for the RSSReader (which is just invoked on a periodic basis and doesn't do a lot of stuff) and distribute other instances (available event-loops) to the web stuff
+[10:34:10] <amr> why only one instance of the worker?
+[10:34:38] <aesteve> the workers are just creating embedded databases
+[10:34:38] <aesteve> for the purpose of the example
+[10:35:23] <aesteve> instantiating more than one instance : 1/ isn't needed . 2/ would lead to create more than one mongo DB for example (which would fail anyway)
+[10:35:28] <amr> yeah makes sense, there's no reason they'd be the bottleneck either
+[10:35:34] <amr> oh
+[12:51:57] <purplefox> cescoffier: was thinking, maybe we should add a link to your "getting started" blog post from the "Get started" section of the vertx.io docs page?
+[12:52:03] <purplefox> as it's a very useful article
+[12:57:46] <msavy> gents, i've hit a small snag with ProxyGen stuff again - i was using a pattern identical to your docs, where you use one proxy to return another (i.e. SomeDatabaseService && MyDatabaseConnection examples on https://github.com/vert-x3/vertx-service-proxy/blob/master/README.md) - i've made a code example to demonstrate the issue https://gist.github.com/msavy/774aae246e23a6d8382d
+[12:58:35] <msavy> now, if i change the method `    void createIngestor(String uuid, Handler<AsyncResult<IngestorToPolicyService>> resultHandler);` to be static, then it compiles fine - but i need a specific impl in that case (as in your example docs)
+[13:05:18] <purplefox> msavy: what error do you get?
+[13:05:27] <msavy> if you scroll down i pasted it as the last item
+[13:05:37] <msavy> here - https://gist.github.com/msavy/774aae246e23a6d8382d#file-5_error
+[13:09:48] <cescoffier> purplefox: I will add the link. Planning to publish post 2 Monday (configuration and random port for tests)
+[13:11:15] <purplefox> msavy: I think it needs to be proxygen and vertxgen: https://github.com/vert-x3/vertx-service-proxy/blob/master/src/test/java/io/vertx/serviceproxy/testmodel/TestService.java
+[13:14:38] <msavy> purplefox: aha! i'll test that out, and if it works i'll make a PR to change the docs
+[13:19:01] <msavy> purplefox: woohoo, it worked!
+[13:23:09] <msavy> purplefox: i had assumed that ProxyGen implied VertxGen
+[13:28:49] <aesteve> pmlopes:  just ping me if you have some time to discuss about SSE :) I should be 'round this afternoon.
+[14:10:56] <DP2015> Any suggestion on the best way or handling json request from client?
+[14:50:09] <rajith> purplefox: morning .. I have a pow wow with david around 9, will ping u afterwards to talk on irc
+[14:50:27] <purplefox> ok
+[15:02:15] <msavy> purplefox: just got back from lunch, had time to do a bit more testing - all seems to work swimmingly. thanks for the pointer!
+[15:03:36] <purplefox> msavy: np
+[15:48:44] <aesteve> happy holiday purplefox ;)
+[15:59:33] <rajith> purplefox: hey, got a few mins?
+[16:00:42] <purplefox> hi, how's it going?
+[16:01:11] <rajith> purplefox: not bad sir... I will have the remaining items all done up when u are back
+[16:01:33] <purplefox> great, no hurry, 3.1 is due in Q4 2015
+[16:01:33] <rajith> purplefox: just to confirm you wanted to drop the flow control stuff for this release right?
+[16:01:52] <purplefox> sec
+[16:02:00] <rajith> purplefox: I have up coming vacation in aug and oct ... so might as well finish it when I can
+[16:02:05] <rajith> purplefox: k
+[16:04:40] <purplefox> do you mean the "fetct" method?
+[16:04:55] <rajith> purplefox: yea
+[16:05:39] <rajith> purplefox: if we don't have time to talk through this, we could wait until you are back
+[16:05:47] <purplefox> i wouldn't worry too much about removing stuff now
+[16:05:52] <purplefox> we can easily do that later if need be
+[16:05:59] <rajith> purplefox: ok cool
+[16:06:41] <rajith> purplefox: I'm also interested in the transport abstraction. Maybe I'll wait until you guys have that discussion at the f2f
+[16:07:01] <purplefox> cool
+[16:07:18] <purplefox> we'll make sure all community stuff is discussed on the user or dev groups anyway :)
+[16:07:25] <rajith> purplefox: there is some interest from our group in doing that ... I know Weston was looking at it before but not sure where it went
+[16:08:24] <purplefox> are you going to be a the vert.x f2f in newcastle ?
+[16:09:34] <rajith> purplefox: I haven't been asked. I think it's dingham's call :)
+[16:10:24] <rajith> purplefox: when is it happening? I'm thinking about going on pto from Aug last week to sep 1st week
+[16:13:17] <purplefox> 21-24 sep
+[16:15:38] <rajith> purplefox: if you and David think my participation is useful I can come over. It will be useful if we discuss the transport stuff.
+[16:16:26] <purplefox> i think it would be useful - i'll ask dave
+[16:16:34] <zerkz> ive implemented a custom authprovider using the vertx interface. I'm a little confused on how to return an AsyncResult<User> for the resultHandler in the authenticate interface
+[16:16:36] <purplefox> also would be good to say hi :)
+[16:16:37] <zerkz> anyone have tips?
+[16:17:15] <purplefox> zerkz: probably the easiest thing to do would be to take a look how the other auth providers do it
+[16:17:44] <zerkz> ah, good idea, good code example
+[16:17:49] <zerkz> ill take a look at JDBCAuthImpl
+[16:19:50] <rajith> purplefox: cool, let me know when you are back from vacation
+[16:20:01] <rajith> purplefox: hope u have a wonderful time!
+[16:20:12] <purplefox> thanks!
+[20:25:46] <newoga> I find that it is tough to read because it each log entry gets broken into two lines..
+[20:25:57] <newoga> For example:
+[20:25:58] <newoga> Jul 17, 2015 2:22:23 PM io.vertx.codegen.CodeGenProcessor lambda$process$48
+[20:25:59] <newoga> INFO: Generated model com.emikra.vertx.request.RequestFactory: resources/vertx-request-js/request_factory.js
+[20:26:20] <newoga> the first line isn[unknown:rsquo]t terribly useful
+[20:32:58] <newoga> I see that the format for logging is here: https://github.com/eclipse/vert.x/blob/master/src/main/java/io/vertx/core/logging/VertxLoggerFormatter.java, but not sure if this can be overridden for specific modules/mvn projects like codegen, it[unknown:rsquo]d be nice if it could be dumped to one line and follow the mvn logging conventions with [LOG LEVEL]
+[20:33:16] <newoga> tools that parse mvn output to ignore lovels would also work in that case
+[23:18:44] *** ChanServ sets mode: +o temporalfox